tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3592780709263923992.post8725659573588078197..comments2023-12-13T13:59:50.319-08:00Comments on Critique of Pure Interest: The Self-Observing Universe: Wheeler & Absolute Idealism 2.0Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3592780709263923992.post-48545675764339222672020-02-02T13:48:13.178-08:002020-02-02T13:48:13.178-08:00This is actually a great insight. It seems that gi...This is actually a great insight. It seems that given infinite quantum potentials there must exist wave functions describing possible self-defining states capable of interacting with one another, which might lead to a physical reality ultimately capable of sustaining our universe via this foundation of "self-observing" entities.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13142631170284640759noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3592780709263923992.post-13569432419632446852018-11-13T12:09:38.201-08:002018-11-13T12:09:38.201-08:00I was reading your side texts after posting the pr...I was reading your side texts after posting the previous comment ( it became anonymous ... I wonder what is going to happen this time ). I don't know ATA but if you wan't to end up with one self defining universe, and not a multiverse, we are actually the same without knowing it. <br /><br />Under this hypotheses all concepts of the mediator ( on the left ) disapear as A is talking to B mediated by C not knowing that A=B=C. Knowing this communication changes and a view on what you could call God changes as God = A+B+C, A=B=C => God = 3xA not knowing that he is also B and C ... It is us in an unseperated form seperated by self definition; he created mankind as his mirror image ... according to my theory the first testament leaves out that the effect of this might be that he became mankind and the rest of this universe. dewerkelijkheidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14388010336463030448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3592780709263923992.post-76782774647424197962018-11-13T10:57:28.199-08:002018-11-13T10:57:28.199-08:00Great to find this article and I should have a loo...Great to find this article and I should have a look at Wheelers work I think. ( And read more about this ).<br /><br />It is verry simulair to a concept I have been thinking about. While the observer effect defines somethings state it also defines that there is an observer. Without structure self observation can only lead to simple abstract things like fundamental particles which don't know what they are and don't know about space or time. At that level the thing that is defined is the observation but not what it is. Still this first construct can be used as buildingstone of a more complex structure. This structure which could be then actually exists if it is self aware, etc, etc. Quantum mechanics is what happens when the big structure looks at the less defined smaller structure and defines aspects which the structure did not define itself ...<br /><br />This system could end in a self defining structure with increasing complexity. The choices are possibly random; If I look at a quantum particle it chooses a random state ... but I also define that I'm able to look at the particle. So at that point I define more then just a random state; I define a state that can observe and there maxwell's devil enters the system. Systems that are able to define themselfs do exist and systems that are not don't. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3592780709263923992.post-4956611242416391002018-09-30T15:02:19.420-07:002018-09-30T15:02:19.420-07:00I've just came accross your ideas randomly whi...I've just came accross your ideas randomly while surfing the web. Perhaps you would like to look at a very similar idealistic interpretation by a guy called Bernardo Kastrup, has some publications in journals and some boos as well. Basically what you say i think it is almost identical to his theory in which all the universe has a first-person subjective view (indeed this is the most fundamental thing) and we are first-person dissociations from it observing it. All matter and energy that we observe is simply the third-person view of its' ideas/idea.PanLamdahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03953299596066238258noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3592780709263923992.post-28695581273601731772017-08-18T04:31:20.184-07:002017-08-18T04:31:20.184-07:00Thanks for your comment. Thanks also for the tip a...Thanks for your comment. Thanks also for the tip about Tsang's book and your own!Peter Sashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06546287595369019854noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3592780709263923992.post-31055079331079795842017-08-14T07:38:41.175-07:002017-08-14T07:38:41.175-07:00Awesome! I think Tsang's self-modifying recurs...Awesome! I think Tsang's self-modifying recursive algorithm might be the missing link in how Consciousness creates the causal loop engendering a digital universe (see "The Fractal Brain Theory). This is quite similar to my ideas in my book "Transcendental Metaphysics".Technovedantahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09402136057525395411noreply@blogger.com